About Our Company

My photo
The Hagerman Group offers construction management, general contracting, design-build, owner’s representative, self-perform, as well as site selection and economic development incentive negation services. This fourth generation, family owned company, was founded in 1908 with Indiana offices located in Fort Wayne and Fishers.

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Construction Job Cams Become Common, Useful Tool

















PHOTO courtesy of EarthCam
A 6-megapixel EarthCam shot captures the Methodist Richardson Medical Center in Richardson, Texas.

Jobsite cameras take scheduled photos from static positions and stream them to private users or public websites, stringing together the images as movies of projects going up or to archive for later use. While the cameras are a hit with developers and marketers of high-end residential buildings and flagship projects, they are becoming a general construction staple, written into specs from the start, say users and vendors.

Sources also say the range of job-cam uses and paybacks is as broad as the roles of people accessing them.

Mark Penny, a senior vice president for the Dallas region of Manhattan Construction Inc., says his company, a large, self-performing general contractor, has used many vendors, although it most recently has turned to EarthCam. "We have a lot of high-profile jobs that people want to see. They are a great opportunity for us and the client to showcase the construction, which makes the job of selling what we do a lot easier," he notes.

Penny says the cameras can improve security, but "that's not the primary use." The photographic record also can verify that activities, such as concrete placement, are done on schedule. But, he says, "in the end, we have a time-lapse video that's just a great wrap-up marketing piece."

Penny says Manhattan doesn't use job cams for safety monitoring, either. "We have on-site safety guys. If we are doing that on a webcam, we may feel we are missing the mark," Penny says.

However, Warren Andres, senior vice president at general contractor Andres Construction, also in Dallas, which uses many subcontractors, is far more hands-on with his job cams. He prefers ePlanit, a local vendor with whom he has had a long relationship. "It's awesome because it is totally mobile. It's cell-phone signals and solar panels on a trailer. Within hours, they can have it on the jobsite."

Andres says he has three monitors on his desk. One shows live feeds from all his cameras. If he sees unsafe work, he sends a photo to the superintendent and demands action. Similarly, he says he can spot slow work crews and do enough quality control to send the message that management is watching. "You can't see everything, but you can pan, tilt and zoom and count the screws on the sheathing."

With hour-and-a-half drive times to get across town, Andres says that, "with a camera, I can be there right now and in more places at once. Productivity goes up, and the value you get in one day sometimes pays for it all."

Jason Burns, vice president of technology at Hunter Roberts Construction Group,New York City, says he often recommends Hackensack, N.J.-based EarthCam to clients. But besides arranging jobsite placement and bringing together owners and vendors, he has little other involvement. "The PR value is for the owner," he says. "EarthCam is icing on the cake. It's nice to show jobs you have done, but it's not providing me much for construction. But [EarthCam] has the software and the know-how to build a job in a two-minute time lapse and make it look good. You're buying that."

Hardware and plans vary from low-resolution off-line cameras that store images for retrieval to ultra-high-resolution units that have big zoom lenses and internet-operable controls. Users can vary shot frequency and pan, tilt and zoom, or PTZ, at will. The images stream to websites and storage systems. Costs vary from a few hundred dollars a month to $30,000 or more per camera per job, depending on the level of sophistication and service.

"We try to be realistic about need," says Penny. "On most projects, we only put one up—although, on the George W. Bush Library, we had two because there were huge landscape features on a 23-acre site. As a builder, we don't necessarily need a Cadillac package.

"I don't know that the proximity of the vendor means anything for service in web-cams," Penny adds. "We interact with their office at a phone number. Service and how they accommodate our needs is more important."

For example, one of his clients wants a 60-minute delay and, if an accident were to happen, assurance that public streaming stops immediately.

Vendors say the drivers for the growing use include the rise of building information modeling and its increased need for accountability; as well as companies chasing work beyond usual areas of operations and needing to extend supervision while holding down travel of staffs trimmed by the recession.

"A lot of companies shrank. Those people went into other industries and haven't come back," says Chandler McCormick, president of Atlanta-based OxBlue, one of the two most widely known providers. "I've heard from clients that there is a gap in the [ranks of] middle management. The cameras give a better understanding of what's happening at the jobsite and lets more experienced personnel keep an eye on [more] projects. They use it as a training tool for new hires."

The picture is clouded, though, by a bitter legal action under way since 2011 between EarthCam and OxBlue. Filing suit in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, EarthCam sought a jury trial on civil and criminal complaints. The plaintiff claims that OxBlue executives and employees have conducted, since 2002, a campaign to steal EarthCam technology and intellectual property and damage its business. It seeks OxBlue's profits as well as damages. OxBlue denies the claims, asserting they are either untrue or un-actionable. Its motions to dismiss have been denied, however, and filings have been piling up as the case works forward.

But there are also innovations in the job-cam market. One Tennessee photo-grapher, Bruce Cain, a retired civil engineer, has developed a business called Elevated Lens. His system raises his laptop-manipulated professional camera as high as 65 ft on a truck-mounted telescoping boom. "It's a pneumatic mast with valves in the cab that you can turn on to raise or lower," he says. "The camera is connected to a computer, so I see what the camera sees. I can pan, tilt, zoom and set the f-stop and speed." He says he obtains the job-cam look of a site vista photo with an 18-mm-to-200-mm zoom lens; employing it on a regular schedule, he can create time-lapse sequences of progress. "This works so good for construction [because] I get the aerial perspective, but, unlike in an airplane, I am really close. I can take several shots and stitch them together—you can't do that with aerial photos." Cain charges $200 a visit and delivers up to 75 photos each time.

Also, an Australian firm, photo-Sentinal, has entered the field with a self-contained, weatherized, low-power, G3-communications-equipped housing to let any construction photographer offer job-cam-style services, especially time-lapse videos, using their own favorite camera.